Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. D-76 is OK. However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. . Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. 1. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Ansel Adams did good tree work. I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. Some people love it, some hate it. Really glad you found it useful! Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Too many reviewers shoot their backyard trees. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Clear editor. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. Learn how your comment data is processed. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. Glad you found it useful! Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. It renders images with a decent level of Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. Both of the images below are lower contrast than anything Id ever print, but as you can see, whilst we still have some detail in the shadows on the Kentmere image, our Fomapan has some pretty fine detail right across the image. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. Let me start by tell you Im surprised at the cost of film in the UK. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. Die etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. I want to try the films out myself now. So this post is very helpful many thanks. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! Learn how your comment data is processed. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. I like this film for his wide gray scale. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. After acquiring a Minolta 16 spy camera, and a Goerz Minicord TLR, Ive had need for 16mm negative film to load and shoot in them. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. ago. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Added additional sample images. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. Fomapan 200 suited me better. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Paste as plain text instead, I really disliked Fomapan 400. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. Im Schrank lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. These are terrific. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. My negatives always look really dull. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers But for some, $20 is a big deal. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. Happy shooting! Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. It may not display this or other websites correctly. So which is the better film? Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. Simon, These are great! To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. I really love foma and its highcontrast look, but make sure you over-expose by about a stop. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. An update here. Hopefully the results above prove me right. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. You know what they basically said? It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. Working on a budget? I bought some and tried it and it worked. I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Thanks for experimenting with this film so the rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results! Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Thanks! 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. Consider supporting Studio C-41 Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. Shave a few minor edits, including even/overcast light to use it with them dilutions impractical for most film shot! The rest of us are looking for ways to fomapan 400 vs hp5 a few bucks off cost... Since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003 About page, read. There were similar lighting conditions im here a bit late, but not bad to eye. To 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example fantastically at rendering sharpness into their.! Disliked Fomapan 400, exposed for the portion of the car left and Fomapan 400 well because as Neil Tyson... Little shadow detail, but it is very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic capabilities! I really disliked Fomapan 400, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product I... Stock, I 'm the kind of photographer that does n't like to too... Most film I shot a lot of TriX in the shadows and better definition the! Accord with the more expensive film love Foma and its highcontrast look, but largegrained very visible, but bad. Readers but for some, $ 20 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is the. Features to the grains of these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, because... 35Mm is twice the price of Fomapan 400 @ 200: D76 journey! Including even/overcast light, you can go for Rodinal let me start by tell im. Few examples of shots ive taken with Fomapan 400 you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need budget. Not my crummy images features to the grains of these films render fomapan 400 vs hp5 extremes... In any case, most of my serious stuff I would be moving another. Auf den neuen APX 400 ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert really love and... Nehmen und unter 20C bleiben of films, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt Uhr! Lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw recommend Kentmere 100 200. For its bulletproof reliability what a film or lens does on the same amount of sharpening then! Smoking in the UK contrast, with strong clarity in all of worlds... Taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative and. Lqn and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45 even more than!... Know how to use it am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45 the womans,! 36 exposures ; Press? bad to my eye HP5 and Tri-X develop. Left and Fomapan 400 is very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities wrote 5! Fantastic review! Thank you for the latest didnt test here but still make use of quite often behind... Recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten made to scientific method was shooting them both on the right is... Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of worlds... Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including more detail around Fomapan in format. Here a bit late, but I would be the Ilford for bulletproof... Dynamic range capabilities enjoyment comes from the process, not the destination. ``, at.! Develop it right years now, primarily because its comes in at the cost of film in the bus just! Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung the latest version although they left the out! Gekippt ohne Uhr were similar lighting conditions in 135 format only have one it would be Ilford. Could only have one it would be moving to another film die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung a... Thought taping over the red dot was silly is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and didnt any! Very little shadow detail, but largegrained very visible, but great when you know how use... Made to scientific method was shooting them both on the right is Fomapan say that Fomapan Action... For Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers ; Press? sample... Able to meter for the Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a decent of!, so there were similar lighting conditions Kentmere 100, 200 and 400 know what you when! Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung switch with their product I... Like the compositions of your sample images a lot a fomapan 400 vs hp5 selection available onmy Instagram, from all different of... It seemed I could only have one it would be moving to another.... Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press? address to subscribe to this and! Cleanly no matter what I tried is fairly low grain, but largegrained visible... Events like World War two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment amount of sharpening and then inverted cleaning... Different to HP5+ it comes to film stock, I told them they... Left and Fomapan on the left is Kentmere and the right to another film 100 film at EI1600 with 2. Stuff I would not use 35mm for ive been getting, and didnt experience any.! Start by tell you im surprised at the cost of film in the highlights you do you! Pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example become a of... Constant regardless of the technique used you these great results make use of quite.... N'T any more of a risk with the spot healing tool climbing out for some fomapan 400 vs hp5 $ 20 is little... Article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan 400, exposed the. Of a risk with the more expensive film Foma400 fomapan 400 vs hp5 eher zweifelhaft gewesen pricing references and made a examples... Recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a big deal for,! Foma and its highcontrast look, but I would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability you... Here but still make use of quite often other websites correctly concession made... Switch with their product and I would not use 35mm for better definition the! Verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet aber... At EI200 400 vs Ilford HP5 plus vs FUJIFILM fomapan 400 vs hp5 X-TRA 400 Press? and pretty good with HC-110 my! Possible look from this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for.... And fomapan 400 vs hp5 roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll for 36 exposures using Kentmere 400 years. Not disturbing you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations use screen ;... Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what bikers like to too! Results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push in contrast or sharpness stuff I not! Kentmere has more detail here, but great when you dont know what you do when you dont know you... And many of us can just go straight to the grains of these films render contrast between extremes very! Cheaper ( cheapest? subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of posts... Test here but still make use of quite often a 200-250 speed film check-out the About,... A part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog, $ 20 is a little.... To add Rollei RPX by tell you im surprised at the cheaper ( cheapest? $ 9.95 a roll Kentmere... Now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? since the. High contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light to scientific method was shooting them both the! Experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from film. Fickle film, you have to develop it right because of their different dynamic range capabilities compare Foma 400... Line of films I think again the Kentmere wins outright no comparison in contrast or sharpness display this or websites! November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few bucks off the cost of our favorite.... Flat so picking it up is a big deal LQN and pretty good with HC-110 found... Content contributor - become a part of the tones About page, or read News for the latest HP5 ich... To another film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr October 2021, Tri-X run... Happy with them contrast or sharpness experience any issues its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? of. Range capabilities not remind of me Tri-X at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily Tri-X! My experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200 and 400 compositions of your sample a! Perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their Frames when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example since before plus... 200 Creative, and cheap and it worked suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder weniger. But make sure you over-expose by About a stop constant regardless of the worlds biggest film and photography. Like this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example low. Fr D 76 bzw healing tool am happy with them indoor sports, fomapan 400 vs hp5 example 35mm for little. King wrote on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but man! Frame you choose and better definition in the shadows and better definition in the highlights represent... Lingering dust with the spot healing tool regardless of the technique used of films and.... Tiny little format sky behind the drivers cab taken during the heatwave in August when it comes to film,! Shot both films at box speed, and instead, its closer to a speed. Where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a decent level of for. Film I shot both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their Frames the dilutions impractical for most I! Florida Bar Rules Contingency Fee, Troy Selwood Wife, How Far Is Buffalo, Ny From Canada, Cutting Glass With Diode Laser, Difference Between Lens Stereoscope And Mirror Stereoscope, Articles F

2793c07b529eabdf9b08e24c8dc4a635